A sacred scarab beetle pushing a glowing ball of dung across the desert at dawn, with ancient Egyptian temple ruins in the background.

An essay · for parents & educators

The wisdom of ancient symbols.

Why modern life has quietly severed us from the oldest way of reading the world — and why children, of all people, need the symbols back.

Before sunrise, in the cool indigo just before the sand turns gold, a beetle begins to work. She shapes a small sphere of dung, climbs to the top of it, and turns once in a slow circle. Scientists now know what she is doing up there. She is taking a photograph of the sky.

The sacred scarab — Scarabaeus sacer — is the first animal ever documented to navigate by the Milky Way. Researchers led by Marie Dacke published the finding in Current Biology in 2013, describing how the beetle, blinded with a tiny cardboard hat, rolls its ball in helpless circles, but with the stars visible rolls it arrow-straight across the dunes. The beetle is a galaxy-guided animal. It has been one for longer than we have been a species.

The ancient Egyptians, with nothing but their eyes, figured out something astonishing about this beetle four thousand years before we invented the word astronomy. They watched her roll her ball at dawn, and they saw the sun being pushed into the sky. They named the god of that motion Khepri — a word that means to come into being. The Smithsonian puts it beautifully: “With a life devoted to excrement but guided by the heavens, dung beetles might embody the famed Oscar Wilde quote, we are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.”

This essay is about that beetle, and about what happens to children when we stop showing them how to see her.

What symbols actually were

We have a tired modern habit of treating ancient Egyptian art as decoration — beautiful, mysterious, irrelevant. It was none of those things. For the Egyptians, symbols were technology. They believed symbols contained heka: operative, functional power. “A properly inscribed symbol,” as one compendium of Egyptian thought puts it, “could protect the living, guide the dead, and even compel the gods themselves to action.” You did not hang an Eye of Horus on your wall because it looked nice. You hung it because it did something.

This is the first thing to re-learn. In ancient Egypt, as the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s 2025 Divine Egypt exhibition frames it, “images of gods weren’t just images — they brought the gods to life.” A symbol was less like a word and more like a bell — a thing you rang, and something answered.

The symbols themselves were drawn from close, patient observation of the natural world. Each choice was a kind of thesis. The falcon became the god Horus because the falcon actually can see from great altitude and dive on its mark — so the falcon was the right image for sky, sovereignty, and divine watchfulness. The ibis became the god Thoth, patron of writing and wisdom, because the Egyptian sign of an ibis on a perch was itself the hieroglyph for the god of knowledge. The lioness became Sekhmet — a goddess who could both spread disease and cure it — because a lioness embodies the uncomfortable truth that the same force which destroys is the force which protects. Power is never one thing.

Even hieroglyphs themselves were hybrid creatures. As scholarship on the Egyptian hieroglyphic system shows, the same sign could read “as a phonogram, as a logogram, or as an ideogram” depending on its context. A picture of a scarab could mean the beetle, the sound kheper, the verb to come into being, or the god Khepri — often all at once. The Egyptians were not confused by this. They thought of the world that way.

And the Eye of Horus — the wedjat — is the most quietly brilliant example. The six parts of the eye encode the fractions 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, and 1/64, which sum to 63/64. Every Egyptian who measured a portion of grain was doing arithmetic inside a myth. When a scribe wrote one sixty-fourth, the missing piece of the fraction was understood to be the piece Thoth supplied magically to restore Horus’s wounded eye. To weigh flour was to participate in a cosmic act of repair. To do math was to remember that wholeness is a labor of the gods.

Try to imagine what this does to a mind — to grow up inside a writing system where every character is a small living picture, where counting is a myth, where the sky and the beetle and the grain store are the same library told in different dialects.

The scarab at first light

Return to the beetle. It is worth lingering on her, because everything the Egyptians believed about rebirth — and everything a child instinctively feels about mornings — lives in one small animal rolling one small ball.

The scarab lays her eggs in dung, forms the dung into a sphere, and rolls the sphere backward across the ground. The Egyptians watched larvae emerge, apparently from nothing, out of the ball. To their eyes, the beetle was self-created — a being that generated life out of rolling darkness. They gave this daily miracle a name: Khepri, the god whose name means to come into being. Khepri was the morning face of the sun. At noon he became Ra; at evening, Atum. But at the edge of dawn, when the sky broke open, he was a beetle.

Modern science has now confirmed, in embarrassingly beautiful detail, that the Egyptians were not wrong to watch this animal so closely. After forming her ball, the scarab performs what researchers call a “dance” — she climbs to the top, rotates, and takes a mental snapshot of the celestial cues above her. Sun by day. Moon by night. Milky Way if neither is available. She uses that snapshot to roll her ball in a perfectly straight line, away from the competitors who would steal it.

A beetle navigating by the galaxy. A ball of dung pushed along a line of starlight. A small creature acting out, unconsciously, the oldest idea human beings ever had: that the rhythms of the heavens are embedded in the rhythms of the earth, and the two are one motion.

It is not a coincidence that the scarab became the most popular amulet in Egyptian history. Heart-scarabs were placed on the chests of the dead to help their hearts beat on into the afterlife. The symbol was not magical thinking imposed on a pretty insect. It was a well-observed natural fact carried forward as myth — because myth was the civilization’s storage medium for what it had learned. When Egyptian parents taught their children that the sun was rolled into the sky by a beetle, they were teaching them to watch beetles. They were teaching them to watch the sky. They were teaching them that the world is not random.

The symbolic animal

Here is where children enter the essay. Because a child’s mind, it turns out, is built for exactly the kind of thinking the scarab demands.

In the 1930s, Jean Piaget named it the symbolic function — the emerging ability, between ages two and seven, “to make one thing, a word or an object, stand for something other than itself.” This is the cognitive super-power that separates a child from all earlier primates. A twig becomes a sword. A circle drawn in the sand becomes the sun. A word becomes a thing. This faculty, once switched on, is the engine of every subsequent capacity: language, number, reading, moral reasoning, imagination.

Piaget’s successor Lev Vygotsky sharpened the point. For Vygotsky, symbols are not just representations of thought — they are the tools with which thinking is done. You do not have a thought and then dress it in a symbol. You have thoughts because you have symbols. Rich symbolic environments build richer minds.

The American psychologist Jerome Bruner, writing in the 1960s, showed that children climb toward abstract reasoning through three progressive modes: enactive (doing), iconic (image), and symbolic (word, numeral, formal sign). The iconic mode — the image-based mode — is the bridge. A child who has never held a picture of something in her mind will struggle to manipulate the abstract idea of it. Hieroglyphs, as a system, are a perfect iconic-symbolic hybrid. They scaffold in exactly the direction a developing mind wants to climb.

The anthropologist Terrence Deacon argues we should stop calling humans the tool-using species, the language species, or even the cooperative species. We are something stranger. “Biologically,” he writes in The Symbolic Species, “we are just another ape. Mentally, we are a new phylum of organisms.” What makes us a new phylum is not the ability to use signs — many animals do that — but the ability to use signs that point to other signs. We live inside nested meanings. Our children, from the moment they begin to pretend, are learning to live there too.

A child between eight and fourteen years old — the age range this site is built for — is inside the single most formative window for this faculty. Concrete operations are giving way to formal ones. She is acquiring the machinery of abstraction. She is hungry, though she cannot say so, for symbolic systems rich enough to stretch the new wings.

And this is exactly the moment at which modern childhood fails her most severely.

Saturated and severed

The child of 2026 is not symbol-starved. She is symbol-drowned. A rough count of the visual signs a middle-schooler processes in a single day — app icons, emoji, brand marks, notification badges, loading spinners, unlock patterns, thumbnails, reaction buttons — runs into the tens of thousands. She is fluent in a vast semiotic landscape. She can read it faster than her parents can.

But here is the difference, and it is everything. The symbols of ancient Egypt were not arbitrary. They were drawn from the body, from the animal world, from observable natural cycles — and they were compressed. A falcon was sky, kingship, horizon, watchful precision, divine judgment, the living pharaoh, and a real bird, simultaneously. A scarab was rebirth, the daily sun, self-creation, the act of becoming, and a living beetle rolling a ball at dawn. You could study one symbol for a lifetime and still be learning.

Modern corporate and UI symbols do not compress meaning — they dilute it. A checkmark. A heart. A flame. A blue bird, then an X. These are markers of convention, designed to be legible at speed and replaceable at will. They are signs in Peirce’s sense of arbitrary symbols — tokens whose meaning rests only on social agreement. They are not tied to embodied experience, and they cannot reward the slow, layered reading that children’s minds were built for.

The journalist Richard Louv coined the phrase nature-deficit disorder to describe what happens to children raised indoors, with arbitrary symbols instead of living ones. He did not mean a clinical diagnosis. He meant a cultural condition — a steady erosion of the habit of attending to weather, to light, to creatures, to the slow turning of the year. The linguists George Lakoff and Mark Johnson argued three decades earlier that almost all abstract thought is built on embodied metaphor: up is good, warm is kind, journey is life. Our most sophisticated ideas are drawn from our simplest physical experiences. A child severed from physical experience is severed from the raw material of thought itself.

The sociologist Max Weber, writing in 1917, called the modern condition disenchantment — not that the world is worse, but that the shared stories which once made it meaningful have been hollowed out. The symbolic canopy has thinned. Joseph Campbell, nearer the end of the twentieth century, put it more bluntly: modern American society suffers from “a lack of effective mythology and ritual,” and “the exclusion of classical studies from the modern educational syllabus has led to a lack of awareness of the mythological foundations” our heritage rests on. He was speaking in 1988. The decades since have not gentled the point.

A reboot on intuition

To spend time inside ancient Egyptian symbolism, then, is not merely a charming enrichment activity. It is something closer to a cognitive vitamin for a civilization that has lost too much of its connective tissue. Egypt is a well-preserved, teachable example of what a whole, nature-keyed, symbolically dense culture looks like from the inside. Its animals are animals we still have. Its stars are stars we can still find. Its river still floods, even if we have damned it.

The philosopher Mircea Eliade described what traditional peoples actually mean by a “sacred symbol.” They do not mean an object set apart from the natural world. They mean an object that opens a window through it: the sun is not only the sun, the beetle is not only the beetle. Every natural thing is, for a child with the right eyes, a revelation in progress. This is why nature-based symbols do something that corporate ones cannot. They invite attention back to the source.

The depth psychologist James Hillman spent a career arguing that soul-making is image-work: that the imagination is not a storage room for fantasies but the organ by which we perceive meaning at all. A child who is given rich, ancient, living images — a falcon god, a scarab at dawn, a feather light enough to weigh a heart — is being handed working tools for a life of interpretation.

Think of the Egypt4Kids fusion, then, as a small piece of exactly that gym. When a child pairs the falcon with the cow — Horus and Hathor, vigilance and nurture — and watches a new creature emerge, she is doing exactly what her mind is biologically shaped to do: holding two compressed images in relation, letting them combine, listening for the meaning that rises from the combination. She is, in the most literal possible sense, exercising the symbolic function Piaget named.

The ancient Egyptians had a word for that kind of work. They called it heka: the power of well-chosen symbols, rightly combined, to change something real.

The wisdom of the old

The Egyptians organized their entire calendar around three seasons — Akhet (the flood), Peret (the emergence), and Shemu (the harvest) — each keyed not to arbitrary dates but to the visible flooding of the Nile. The flood itself was predicted by the heliacal rising of Sirius: the star’s first appearance before dawn after seventy days of absence from the sky. Over three thousand years of Egyptian civilization, agriculture was timed to that one stellar signal. The myth that Isis wept for her lost husband Osiris — and that her tears became the flood — was a mnemonic. It was how a non-literate population remembered the agricultural calendar.

Symbols like these were not escapes from science. They were its storage medium. Anthropologists have a phrase for this: traditional ecological knowledge — practical information about seasons, species, weather, and land, encoded and transmitted through ritual, story, and image because that is the format that survives centuries without textbooks. A child who learns the story of Khepri is also, accidentally, learning when beetles are active, what dawn looks like in the desert, and why mornings matter.

This is perhaps the deepest reason to spend time with these old symbols. They remind us — and, more importantly, remind the children — that the natural world is not a backdrop to human life. It is the book human life was first written in. The beetle’s ball really does catch the light at sunrise. The flood really does come. The falcon really does see farther than we do. The symbols are not imposed on nature. The symbols are nature paying attention to itself.

A small homework

If you have read this far, you are almost certainly a parent or a teacher, and you already know how hard it is to pull a child’s gaze off a screen. So we will not ask for that here. We will ask for something much smaller.

Tomorrow morning, before the house wakes, look east. If there is a cloud, find the pink underside of it. Notice the first time something casts a shadow. Imagine the beetle, somewhere on the other side of the world, at her ball, turning once in a circle to find the light. You are doing, in a quieter dialect, exactly what she is doing. You are locating yourself by paying attention.

Now show it to a child. Tell her what the beetle is. Tell her the Egyptians called the god of the morning the one who comes into being. Watch her face.

That is the reboot. The world has not lost its symbols. We only stopped introducing our children to them.

Egypt4Kids

Sources & further reading

Every factual claim in this essay is linked in-line. A consolidated list for teachers and curious readers: